Thursday, November 1, 2012

Cord-Cutters | Best Streaming DESKTOP





Lab Tested: 2012 Mac mini gets a nice speed boost

Last week, Apple refreshed the Mac mini with faster processors, faster USB 3.0 ports and new graphics. The Macworld Lab was able to get our hands on the new Mac mini systems and our Speedmark 8 test results show the new machines are between 31 and 37 percent faster overall than the Mac minis they replace. The new systems were faster in all of our tests, but processor intensive tests results were only slightly higher. Interestingly, the hard drive tests were much faster on the new systems, though they still use 5400-rpm hard drives.
The new $599 Mac mini has the same 5400-rpm 500GB hard drive and 4GB of RAM as the 2011 entry-level Mac mini, but it gets a speed bump from its previous 2.3GHz dual-core Core i5 processor to a 2.5GHz dual-core Core i5. The new $599 Mac mini still uses integrated graphics, but is updated from the previous Intel HD Graphics 3000 to Intel HD Graphics 4000.
The new $799 Mac mini has a 2.3GHz quad-core Core i7 processor; the previous high-end Mac mini used the same dual-core Core i5 found in the new low-end system. This new model drops the discreet AMD graphics found in last year’s step-up system in favor of Intel’s integrated HD Graphics 4000. As with last year’s $799 system, the new model comes with 4GB of RAM and a 5400-rpm, 1TB hard drive.

2012 Mac mini: Speedmark scores

Speedmark 8 score
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i7 (Late 2012)164
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Late 2012)131
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)120
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)100
Mac mini/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (Mid 2010)78
All results are scores. Higher scores are better. Best result in bold. Reference models in italics. Macworld Lab testing by James Galbraith, Albert Filice, Kean Bartelman, and William Wong.
In our testing, we found the new $599 Mac mini to be 31 percent faster overall than its predecessor. The new Intel HD Graphics 4000 helped the 2012 low-end Mac mini beat last year’s system by 60 percent in the Cinebench OpenGL test and by 27 percent in Portal 2.
We also looked at the performance differences between the new low-end model and a mid-2010 entry-level Mac mini with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor. The 2012 Mac mini was 68 percent faster and finished the Cinebench CPU test in half the time of the 2010 model. The older system took nearly three times as long to complete our Photoshop action script.
As you’d expect, processor-intensive tests that can use all four cores (and eight virtual cores, thanks to the Core i7’s Hyper Threading technology) showed the new high-end Mac mini to be much faster than the 2011 high-end Mac mini with a dual-core 2.5GHz Core i5 processor. MathematicaMark was 78 percent faster on the new system, Cinebench CPU tests took 53 percent less time to complete, and HandBrake was 24 percent faster than the old model. On the other hand, the previous high-end model, with its discreet AMD Radeon HD 6630M graphics, was faster on GPU-intensive tests, like Portal 2 (9 percent more frames per second) and Cinebench OpenGL (24 percent more frames per second).
If you’re considering whether to buy the entry-level or the higher-end model, our Speedmark 8 results show that the $799 model was 25 percent faster overall, with the biggest gains being in MathematicaMark and Cinebench CPU, which were 78 percent and 53 percent faster, respectively, than the new $599 Mac mini.
Buyers of the $799 Mac mini also have the option of upgrading to Apple’s new hybrid Fusion Drive, which marries 128GB of flash storage with 1TB of standard hard drive for a zippy combination of speed, high capacity, and relatively low cost per gigabyte. The Fusion Drive is only available as a build-to-order option and we are impatiently awaiting our custom system’s arrival.
Check back soon for those results, as well as the full review of the new Mac minis.

2012 Mac mini: Individual application scores

Duplicate
2GB Folder
Compress
6GB Folder
Uncompress 
6GB Folder
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i7 (Late 2012)138323130.5
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Late 2012)149.3345.1144.9
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)246.9359.7230.6
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)234.7390.7228.7
Mac mini/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (Mid 2010)278.8524.1216.6
Results are in seconds. Lower results are better. Best result in bold. Reference models in italics.

2012 Mac mini: Individual application scores

Import
iMovie
Archive
iMovie
Share to
iTunes
HandBrake
Encode
Mac min/ 2.3GHz Core i7 (Late 2012)69.664.4119
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Late 2012)106.776.1147.7
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)121.371.7156
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)129.180.3166.3
Mac mini/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (Mid 2010)114.7185.2164
Results are in seconds. Lower results are better. Best result in bold. Reference models in italics.

2012 Mac mini: Individual application scores

iPhoto
Import
Aperture
Import
Photoshop
CS5 Action
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i7 (Late 2012)97.275.4126
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Late 2012)114.886145
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)153.6102.8161.7
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)158.4141.3233.7
Mac mini/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (Mid 2010)207.7202.1419.3
Results are in seconds. Lower results are better. Best result in bold. Reference models in italics.

2012 Mac mini: Individual application scores

iTunes
Encode
Cinebench
CPU
VMware
PCMark
Mathe-
maticaMark 8
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i7 (Late 2012)100.7731347.71.82
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Late 2012)113.71481052.71.06
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)1151541045.71.02
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)123.7186.38551
Mac mini/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (Mid 2010)161.7309.7707.70.7
iTunes and Cinebench CPU results are in seconds, (lower results are better). VMware PCMark and MathematicaMark 8 are scores (higher results are better). Best result in bold. Reference models in italics.

2012 Mac minis: Graphics tests

Cinebench
OpenGL
Portal 2
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i7 (Late 2012)2257.2
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Late 2012)18.652
Mac mini/2.5GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)23.970.7
Mac mini/2.3GHz Core i5 (Mid 2011)11.640.8
Mac mini/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (Mid 2010)12.738.4
Results are in frames per second. HIgher results are better. Best result in bold. Reference models in italics.

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Cord-Cutters | Best Live Streaming Media Devices

Which streaming-media device is right for you?

-->


There are more ways than ever to stream Netflix and other online services. But which device is best for you?








 


Top contenders: Apple TV ($100), Roku HD ($60), Roku LT ($50)
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
Once a fringe activity for the geeky set, online video streaming is now officially mainstream, thanks in large part to the omnipresence of Netflix on nearly all Internet-connected entertainment devices. But with so many options now available, what's the best solution -- be it for Netflix, Hulu Plus, Vudu, Amazon, or any of the myriad other online video sources?
As with anything in real life, there isn't one simple, straightforward answer that works for everyone. But we've created a set of different recommendations that should work for nearly anybody, based upon your individual priorities.
The best news for anyone shopping in 2012? Prices for excellent media-streaming devices now start at just $50, with plenty of other great options (including brand-new Blu-ray players) at less than $120.

Roku: Best solution for less than $60

(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
Forget $100 -- $50 is the new entry-level price point for streaming video. The Roku LT is the only product at this price point, but it's an enthusiastic Editors' Choice. With built-in Wi-Fi and free control apps available on iOS and Android (and, if you're old-fashioned, a regular old remote), the Roku LT delivers Netflix, Amazon, Hulu Plus, and hundreds of other streaming-video and audio channels to any TV (including older, non-HD models).
Key compatible services: Netflix, Amazon Video On Demand, Hulu Plus, Crackle, Mediafly, MLB.TV, NHL GameCenter, NBA Game Time, MLS MatchDay Live, UFC, Pandora, MOG, Rdio, TuneIn Radio, Flickr, Dish World, FoxNews.com, NBC News, Facebook photos, Flickr, plus hundreds of others. HBO Go and Epix are also available, but only for existing subscribers of those channels on compatible ISPs and cable providers. The new Plex "channel" now lets users stream video, audio, and photos from their networked PCs and Macs -- a long overdue addition to the Roku feature set. (Disclosure: CNET and some of its sister CBS-owned properties -- such as Chow and Showtime -- are also available on Roku.)
Who shouldn't buy it? The Roku is best for anyone who does not need iTunes compatibility. YouTube and Vudu are notable no-show apps on Roku. If you've got a big DVD or Blu-ray collection, you'll probably want to opt for a Blu-ray player instead (see below) -- though, for $50, the Roku would still be a great option for a second room.
Worthwhile alternative: The Roku HD is nearly identical to the LT. It costs $10 more, but it tends to be in stock (online and in stores) more often than the Roku LT, which is almost perpetually sold out.

Apple TV: Best solution for Apple fans (and a great choice for everyone else)

Apple TV (2012)(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
If you want the most diversity of content, the Roku box is the way to go. But if you're a die-hard Apple aficionado, Apple TV may be the better choice. It's the only box that's compatible with iTunes, iCloud, and AirPlay. The latter function allows you to stream audio (like Pandora and other Web- and app-based audio streams), photos, and even some video from your iPad, iPhone, or iPod Touch directly to your TV screen by just tapping on the screen.
The latest (2012) version of the Apple TV adds support for 1080p video output (not as big a deal as you'd expect) and an updated home screen. More important, though, are a flurry of feature upgrades that have been rolled out over the past few months: the addition of a Hulu Plus channel and AirPlay screen mirroring. The latter feature allows 2011 and 2012 Macs running the new Mountain Lion OS to "mirror" what's on their computer screens to the TV via AirPlay -- and that includes free Flash video sites such as Comedy Central and Hulu.com.
Key compatible services: iTunes Video, AirPlay, Netflix, Hulu Plus, YouTube, Vimeo, MLB.TV, NBA, NHL, WSJ Live, iTunes Match Music, Internet radio, many audio and video podcasts, Flickr, iCloud Photo Stream
Who shouldn't buy it? If you're not an Apple person -- no iPad, no iPhone, no iPod, no Mac -- you won't get as much value out of this device. And if you want services like Amazon Instant Video or HBO Go, you'll need to look elsewhere (namely, Roku).
Worthwhile alternative: If you want more flexibility -- albeit with a far bigger budget -- you could always just attach a Mac Mini to your TV.

PS3: Best solution for gamers

Sony PS3(Credit: Sony)
Sony's ad campaign proudly touts that the PlayStation 3 "only does everything." For once, it's a case of truth in advertising. Everyone knows the PS3 is a great game console and a Blu-ray player. But -- thanks to an ongoing series of firmware updates -- it's now a formidable media streamer as well. The PS3 offers Netflix, Hulu Plus, Vudu, Amazon, NHL, MLB.TV, and NFL Sunday Ticket -- the same "every out of market football game" package that was previously available only to DirecTV customers. The PS3 is also able to stream music, video, and photos from networked PCs and attached USB drives. Sweetening the pot even more: at $249, the PS3 is cheaper now than it's ever been. Bottom line? The PS3 is far and away the most versatile box to have under your TV.
Key compatible services: Netflix, Vudu, Hulu Plus, Amazon, MLB.TV, NHL GameCenter, NFL Sunday Ticket, Sony Entertainment Network, DLNA (home media streaming); plays DVDs, Blu-rays, CDs, and USB-based media
Who shouldn't buy it? If you're not a gamer, the PS3 is somewhat less appealing. You'll also need to invest in a separate remote or remote adapter (if you don't want to use the PlayStation controller), since the PS3 lacks built-in compatibility with infrared remotes.
One reason to wait: There are rumors that Sony may soon announce a third-generation PlayStation 3 before the end of 2012. If you're considering a new PS3, it might be worth waiting -- at least until Labor Day -- to see if that's more than idle speculation.
Worthwhile alternative: The Xbox 360 also does double duty for gaming and online entertainment, offering a recently expanded entertainment slate, including Netflix, Amazon, Vudu, Hulu Plus, YouTube, Crackle, and Last.fm. Xbox also offers ESPN3, HBO Go, and Epix -- but, as on all other compatible systems, only for existing subscribers of those channels on compatible ISPs and cable providers. And existing Comcast and Fios subscribers can even configure the Xbox to work as a cable box, with a limited channel selection. However, unlike the PS3, to get many of these services you also need to be an Xbox Live Gold subscriber ($35 to $60/year). And the Xbox can only play standard DVDs, not Blu-ray movies.

Panasonic DMP-BDT220: Best DVD/Blu-ray player under $140

Panasonic DMP-BDT220
The Panasonic DMP-BDT220
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
We love the PS3, but we also realize that not everyone's a gamer -- and that the PS3's $249 price tag may be a budget buster for many. Thankfully, there are many Blu-ray players that offer access to several online streaming services (Netflix, Pandora, and YouTube being the most common), as well as the sort of disc playback you won't find on dedicated boxes like the Roku or Apple TV. For 2012, our top Blu-ray choice is the Panasonic DMP-BDT220, which can be had for less than $140.
Key compatible services: Netflix, Amazon, Vudu, YouTube, Pandora; DLNA (home media streaming); plays DVDs, Blu-rays, CDs, USB- and SD-based media
Who shouldn't buy it? If you don't need compatibility with discs (DVDs, Blu-rays), or if you don't have the space for a disc player, opt for the Roku or Apple TV above.
Worthwhile alternative: You can find alternatives to the Panasonic by checking out our list of best Blu-ray players list. Just be sure you get one with built-in Wi-Fi -- not a "Wi-Fi-ready" model that requires the purchase of an additional dongle.

WD TV Live Hub: Best solution for hard-core tech geeks

(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
As we've shown, all of the products listed above are excellent choices, each with its own strengths. Many of them are also good for streaming audio and video files from networked PCs. But what about the "hard-core" tech enthusiast -- the one whose NAS drive is full of MKV, ISO, and VOB files? (If you don't know what any of that means, don't worry -- it just means you're normal.)
For that consumer, the best choice we've seen to date is the WD TV Live. Advanced users will appreciate that it was able to read just about every file type we threw at it, while newbies will enjoy its fairly slick interface for when you just want to kick back and watch something on Netflix, Hulu Plus, Vudu, or YouTube. It's also the only product on this list that can double as a viewer for Slingbox content (thanks to a recent firmware upgrade). And unlike earlier versions, the latest WD TV Live unit includes built-in Wi-Fi as well.
Key compatible services: Netflix, Hulu Plus, Vudu, YouTube, Vimeo, Pandora, CinemaNow, MLB.TV, Spotify, Flickr, Mediafly, Live 365, TuneIn Radio, Shoutcast, AOL TV, SlingPlayer, BILD TV (Germany only), Australian Broadcasting iview (Australia only)
Who shouldn't buy it? If you don't have a hard drive full of your own (non-iTunes) movie and music files, opt instead for the Roku or Apple TV above.
Worthwhile alternative: If you like the WD TV Live feature set and would also like a full terabyte of built-in storage (also streamable to other PCs, Macs, and WD TV boxes via DLNA), opt for the WD TV Live Hub. In addition to the roomy onboard storage (which can be supplemented by additional USB drives), the Live Hub offers a nearly identical feature set to its smaller brother -- but it lacks Wi-Fi, unless you invest in an add-on dongle.

A cheap HDMI cable: Best DIY wired PC-to-TV solution

Want a "quick and dirty" solution for streaming video on your TV? If you've got an HDTV, and your laptop has an HDMI output, just get a long cable and call it a day. (This will also work with most DVI and DisplayPort/Thunderbolt outputs, if you have the correct adapters or cables.) And remember: a cheap HDMI cable will work fine -- no reason to pay for so-called "premium" cables. While the gadgets above will cost you $50 minimum, this solution can cost you as little as $6 -- assuming, of course, that you already have the laptop and the HDTV.

What about just buying a Smart TV?

If you're in the market for a new TV, you might think, "These new 'Smart TVs' already have these streaming features built-in. Why don't I just get one of them and forgo the boxes mentioned above? It's no fuss, no muss, and no wires."
Well, sure, you could do that. But you're probably going to end up overpaying for the streaming features, and actually losing flexibility in the long run. We prefer to buy a TV strictly on picture quality, and then spend an extra $50 to $250 on getting any one of the devices above, depending upon your needs (PS3 for gaming; a Blu-ray player if you still want to play your old DVD collection; a Roku if you want maximum value and affordability; Apple TV if you already have a lot of iTunes content). That way, you can always mix and match boxes in the months and years ahead, and still have your TV purchased on maximizing picture quality.
How about the Nexus Q?

-->
In late June, Google announced its first home media streamer, the Nexus Q. Unfortunately, while the hardware offers a lot of promise, streaming services are currently limited to Google-only options (Play Video, Play Music, and YouTube), and the unit can only be controlled via Android smartphones and tablets. To make matters worse, the product retails for $300. In other words, it does less and costs more than all of the products listed above.
Noting the issue, Google recently delayed the Nexus Q's ship date and suggested that it was working to improve the product before it was released. That's a step in the right direction, but -- without the combination of a big price drop and a firmware update that adds some significant feature upgrades -- CNET cannot recommend the Nexus Q in its current state.

Original Article Can be Found HERE at cnet.com
CNET is in NO way affiliated or connected to watch_iTV.